I am a big fan of Meantime Brewery, with an appreciation of
the company and its beers which goes back many years; so when their PR people
sent me a bottle of IPA 2000 to review, from their “Brewers’ Collection”, I was
both flattered and delighted.
IPA 2000 is a limited edition brew of just 1,200 bottles,
with each one individually numbered. It is also a big beer in several ways, not
least of which is its presentation in a wired corked, 750ml bottle. The other
“big” selling point is its 8.0% ABV.
According to the bottle the beer was brewed to celebrate their 2,000th
beer tap; although initially I wasn’t sure what exactly is meant by this rather
American sounding term. Apparently it refers to the brewery achieving
its 2,000th beer tap listing, although I’m not quite sure how they keep such
close tabs on what must be an ever changing market.
So what about the beer itself? Well unfortunately, in spite of my high initial expectations, this particular brew doesn’t do it for me at all. The
clue lies with the rest of the write up on the back label, as the brewery claim
they have combined one of their most traditional styles of beer (Meantime IPA),
with Champagne yeast to infuse the beer with a delicate
carbonation.
And there in lies the rub, as the label goes on to say that
“The complex and fruity flavours of the IPA are allowed to develop and work
with the Champagne yeast to give bready notes typically
associated with sparkling wines.” Personally, I think the Champagne
yeast has worked against the flavours of the IPA and smothered them. So sorry
Meantime, this beer really doesn’t do anything for me, and whilst this might
have been considered an interesting experiment, it hasn’t worked for me.
I am sure there are many out there who will really rave over
this beer, but unfortunately I’m not one of them. This may sound rather
churlish, seeing as I was given the beer for free, but I speak as I find, and
whilst the beer has obviously been brewed according to the best traditions of
Meantime, I am not at all keen on it.
I realise there are all sorts of strange fusions going on at
present between the worlds of brewing and wine-making, and I saw plenty of
evidence of this in Belgium last year with strong beer being matured in oak
barrels formerly used to hold Burgundy wines. To me, these are novelty beers; interesting to try on the odd occasion, especially alongside certain foods, but I know
what I like in a beer and feel that using Champagne yeast to ferment this beer
muddies the water and detracts from the flavours and aromas one would expect
from the malt and the hops.
Sorry Meantime, especially as I’m certain you were expecting
a more positive review. That’s probably me off the Christmas card list, or worse
and no more invites to new beer launches, but despite this I’ll continue
looking out for your more “normal” beers, and more traditional styles, in both
the on, as well as the off-trade.
2 comments:
You have to say as you find. Fortunately I have yet to be tempted to give a excessively rosy review as no one has sent me any freebies. Not much point, really, as I'm not much good at tasting notes: I can never detect the flavours of apricots, biscuits, long coffee finishes or crushed cockroaches that others so blithely describe.
“Apricots, biscuits, long coffee finishes or crushed cockroaches”, are we talking about craft-beer here, Nev?
Seriously, I think it was a case of a brew too far, and unfortunately indicative of what is going on in certain sectors of the brewing industry at the moment. One day things will go full-circle and people will come back to beer brewed from straight forward malt and hops, and fermented with a proper, traditional English ale yeast!
Post a Comment