I shan’t be going to next month’s CAMRA Member’s Weekend and AGM which, this year, takes place in Nottingham.
Work and family commitments have conspired against me, so regrettably I am
unable to spare the time necessary in order to attend.
In some ways this is a great shame, as from what I understand Nottingham
is a great city for beer, with much to offer the drinker and beer connoisseur.
As well as a host of award-winning breweries, Nottingham
also has some great pubs, including one of the few in the city which I have
been in; the ancient and quite unique Olde Trip to Jerusalem,
which nestles below the imposing Castle Rock.
The weekend would also have afforded the opportunity to catch up with
friends both old and new from within the campaign.
In other ways though I am quite pleased not to be going, as
the conference proceedings themselves are of little or no interest to me.
Reminiscent of a 1970’s Trades Union Conference, this part of the weekend
really shows that CAMRA is living in the past and has refused to move on, as I
will demonstrate later. A glance through the order paper, published in this
month’s “What’s Brewing” confirms this introspection, as apart from the
eminently sensible motion proposed by Tandleman and his
CAMRA colleague Graham Donning which draws attention to the outrageous practice
adopted by many pubs of charging a premium for half pints, there is nothing
really of interest and certainly little of relevance to today’s fast changing
beer scene.
Among the less sensible motions is one which effectively
rules out future CAMRA involvement in the “There’s a Beer for That” campaign,
and one calling for the campaign to withdraw its support for the Cyclops scheme
of beer tasting/assessment, on the grounds that it has expanded to include all
beers. Yes let’s isolate ourselves from the brewing industry and burn all the
bridges that CAMRA has so carefully built over the years with brewers and
publicans alike.
The most controversial motion though, is Number 20; the last
one on the order paper. It reads “This conference proposes that CAMRA shall
oppose fracking and unconventional hydrocarbon exploration and
extraction on both a local and national scale, as they pose a real and
substantial threat to the production and quality of real ale”. Yeah, right
on Swampy!
I am assuming that the relevance of this motion to CAMRA is
the potential effect this practice could have on underground water supplies
(aquifers). Not withstanding the controversy behind fracking, the jury is still
out on the practice, and anyway areas suitable for shale gas extraction in the UK
are both limited and fragmented; unlike the United
States and Canada.
In addition, the current record low price of oil makes even exploration for
ground-sourced hydrocarbons unviable at the moment.
To return to the potential threat to water supplies; these
days many underground sources are unsuitable for brewing because they contain
high levels of nitrates, which originate from agricultural run-off, so the
whole point of the motion is rendered irrelevant
anyway.
Irrelevant until one looks deeper at the motive for
including this motion on the ballot paper! Any branch, of individual member,
can submit a motion for debate at conference, but before going forward all
motions are first vetted by CAMRA’s equivalent of the Politburo. Far worthier
motions than this one have been rejected in the past, and I’m certain many will
have been discarded prior to this year’s conference. This then begs the
question is CAMRA lurching further to the left? Or is it unashamedly trying to
woo the green vote?
Either way this issue is at best a fringe one, and at worst
totally outside the Campaign’s remit. For me this is yet further proof that
CAMRA has lost its way and is in grave danger of being sidelined as an
irrelevance in today’s fast evolving and rapidly changing beer industry.
CAMRA currently boasts a membership in excess of 170,000
which is pretty impressive until one considers that its policy is determined
solely by those members who attend the National AGM.
The last set of figures I have seen for the Members Weekend – National
Conference are from the Norwich Conference, which took place in 2013. I was one
of the 1,300 members who attended that event and, enjoyable though it was, when
viewed as a total of the current membership, this figure is less than 1%, which
quite frankly is appalling.
That issues of policy, membership fees, campaigning issues
etc can be decided by less than 1% of the total membership is scandalous, and
belies any attempt by CAMRA to promote itself as a democratic organisation
responsive to, and in touch with the needs of its members. The fact that
conference motions are pre-vetted by a central committee (shades of Joseph
Stalin here!), before they are even put before the meeting is nothing short of
a disgrace.
There are already serious rumblings amongst the grass-roots
membership, and there is a small, but increasingly vociferous Unofficial CAMRA Facebook group. The Provisional CAMRA, perhaps? It really is time for the
organisation to wake up and smell the coffee, or should that be the malt and
hops?