Fellow blogger The Pub Curmudgeon wrote a post a week or so ago,
regarding what to do when food in a pub or restaurant isn’t quite up to scratch.
The gist of the post was that it is often far easier to return an off-pint of
beer than it is food; even when the latter is obviously not right. Blogger Ed
Wray commented that it could be unwise to return food, owing to the risk of
kitchen staff spitting on, or in it, before they bring it back to you. I backed
up this concern with some horrendous stories of kitchen staff exacting their revenge in
even more grotesque ways. These actions were recounted to me by a work
colleague whose wife used to work in a restaurant.
Leaving these particularly unpleasant stories to one side
for a while, Curmudgeon went on to recount how he’d had to return food in
various pubs when things weren’t to his liking. He admitted to being a fussy
eater; something which I certainly am not. With one or two exceptions, I will
eat most things, but the article did prompt me to think back to a couple of
occasions where I had cause to either return my food, or had ended up leaving
most of it on the plate.
Fortunately these instances have been quite rare, but oddly
enough they both took place last year. The first "food fail" happened just over a
year ago, whilst on a CAMRA bus trip in which we visited a few pubs in the
Edenbridge area. I haven’t named the pub where the event took place; especially
as it was over a year ago. If you are desperate to know which one it was though,
I suggest you take a look back to a post I made last February.
Not as good as it looks |
It turned out that the licensees were away, and I suspect
that had they been present this incident would either not have occurred, or it
would have been rectified to the satisfaction of both parties. For my part, I
haven’t been back to the pub, and if I do return I will definitely not be
eating there.
The other incident, where I was unable to eat what was put
in front of me, was in no way the fault of the restaurant concerned; but rather
my not liking the manner in which the food has been prepared. This particular "food
fail" occurred last August on the evening of the first day of the European
Beer Bloggers & Writers Conference in Brussels.
It took place in the
sumptuous surroundings of the Belga Queen, which is one of the
Belgian capital’s finest restaurants.
Posh plates |
Now this was all happening courtesy of the Belgium Family
Brewers, so it seems rather churlish of me to criticise. The meal was a set
course, although had I known what was going to be served up I would have gone
for the vegetarian option! Roast rack of veal, was the main course – bloody,
fatty and far too underdone, for my liking. Unfortunately for me, this is how the Belgians
like their meat! As stated earlier, I am not a fussy eater, but I am not a fan
of meat which is rare, bloody or otherwise undercooked. Leaving health issues
aside, I find rare meat more an exercise in chewing than enjoyment, and fail
totally to see the attraction.
Posh nosh - rather too rare for my liking |
It seemed however, that I was not alone in my distain of the
main dish, as on the walk back to the hotel, I joined several other delegates
in popping into a nearby kebab shop for some chips. Posh nosh is not always
what it’s cracked up to be, and when you’ve had a belly full of beer you need
some real “comfort food” to help soak it up!
A typical Japanese meal |
I have digressed somewhat from the question of whether or
not to return food which isn’t to one’s liking. As mentioned earlier, my
colleague’s wife worked in several restaurant kitchens, and had some horrendous
tales to tell about what happened to customers foolish enough to return their
food.
As I am sure you can imagine, many chefs have vastly
over-inflated egos; just think of certain so-called “celebrity chefs" and you
will know what I mean. They tend to take any criticism of their cooking, however well
intended, as a personal affront. My kitchen informant recounted horror stories of bogies being
mixed into food which had been sent back, as well as spit, but the worst one
involved a returned steak. This was unceremoniously wiped around the inside of
the toilet pan before being returned to the unfortunate and clueless customer.
I would like to think that most kitchen staff wouldn’t dream
of acting in such a disgusting, and potentially heath-threatening manner; if
they did, then they should never be allowed to work in catering again. But as
it is difficult to know what exactly goes on behind the closed doors of a pub
restaurant or kitchen, and hard to predict just how widespread such practices
are, I would ere on the side of caution. So if you are served with a meal which
isn’t quite right, don’t be too hasty in sending it back.
You may be better off just leaving the food, but if you feel
sufficiently strongly about its poor quality, bring it to the pub or restaurant
management’s attention. At the very least you should be entitled to a reduction
in your bill. In the light of what I have described above, be wary of offers of
vouchers or a free meal next time, as you may find the staff remember you, and
not in a nice way!
However, most people out for a meal are not looking for confrontation,
especially as this can further sour what should be an enjoyable occasion. If
this is the case you may just prefer to never eat in that place again. Spread
the word amongst your friends and family, if you feel that put out by your experience.
It’s a tricky thing, as we Brits don’t like to complain and
cause a fuss, but if we wish to see high standards maintained in our pubs and
restaurants, we really should say something; even if it is after the event.
2 comments:
Good post, although I think I should clarify that I was not talking about food that was "not quite up to scratch" but which was completely inedible!
My experience is that the main complaint about bad food in pubs is that it is seriously undercooked, and the second is, as in one of your examples, getting extremely tough, fatty, gristly meat.
I've also had one or two examples where the actual dish turned out to be completely different from how it was described on the menu, although I can't recall the precise details.
Thanks for the correction Mudge. Food which is inedible, due to being seriously undercooked, is an obvious health hazard, but unless it’s something like a steak, where it’s easy enough to pop it back under the grill and cook it properly, I don’t think I’d want to risk having it re-heated. My undercooked liver was a case in point, as its practically raw state had the potential to contaminate everything else on the plate!
Complaining when there’s nothing inherently wrong with the food, apart from it not being quite to your liking, does run the risk of rubbing up the kitchen staff the wrong way, and as with a pint of beer which isn’t bad enough to send back, it might be better to keep quiet.
Serious faults, such as undercooking, do warrant further action, and whilst accepting that anyone can make a mistake, the establishment concerned need to realise that such errors can seriously affect people’s health. If they are genuinely sorry, then fair enough, although even then it may be worth a quiet word with your local public health department. You may well be doing your fellow human beings a big favour!
Post a Comment