Monday, 6 July 2026

A farewell to a bygone era, and a welcome to a new one

I’m getting behind with my posts again, although I shan’t bore you with what’s been keeping me from blogging. I’m part way through a write up of last Fridays’ day at the seaside, aka a day out in Hastings with West Kent CAMRA, but with six pubs involved, there’s a fair amount of detail to plod through.

Instead, I want to reflect briefly on the passing at the age of 81, of Humphrey Smith, the owner of Tadcaster-based, Samuel Smith's Old Brewery. A controversial and divisive figure, in many respects, but also someone who steered this staunchly traditional, family business, through the troubled waters of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Those who have been through these times, in my case since the mid 1970’s, will be aware of the many changes that have occurred in the drink’s trade during this period.

Whilst organisations, such as CAMRA, might have welcomed some of these changes, with hindsight the introduction of the 1989 Beer Orders, caused serious damage to the drinks trade. The most damaging aspect of this legislation, however well-intentioned, it might have been, was the removal of the link between pubs and breweries, effectively turning the pub trade on its head. In the minds of many older drinkers, such as me and my contemporaries, the Beer Orders destroyed the pub trade we remember, and replaced it with an increasingly cut-throat, dog-eat-dog race to the bottom.

None of these changes had much effect on Samuel Smith’s, which was established in 1758, in the North Yorkshire town of Tadcaster. It is by far, the smallest of the three breweries based in the town, owning just 200 pubs. It is also an unlimited company, which permits it to maintain financial privacy, as well as allowing the directors to keep a tightly controlled family grip on the business.

Because of its relatively small size Samuel Smiths remained largely unaffected by legislation such as the Beer Orders, but that didn’t mean that when Humphrey took over the business, in the 1980’s, he didn’t bring in any changes. First and foremost, of these, was turning tenants into managers, directly employed by the brewery, a move which enabled the business to dictate the policies it has become well known for.

With regard to these, people tend to remember the more controversial edicts, such as banning television, the use of mobile phones, and also swearing in Samuel Smith pubs, but as the company website states, their outlets remain as "Havens from the digital world", where conversation and interaction with other customers is actively encouraged. Policies that few pub lovers could raise serious objections to (unless one is trying to find the time of that last bus or train home).

What is rather more concerning, is the often-arbitrary way in which quite a few Sam Smith’s pubs have been closed, seemingly on the whim of the brewery’s late owner. An online search will reveal further details, although some sources estimate the number to be just over half of the company’s tied estate of houses. Following Humphrey’s passing, it would be nice to see at least some of these outlets re-opening, especially in locations such as small villages, where communities have been left pub-less.

We shall have to see what happens, but as far as continuation is concerned, the London estate is already being run by Humphrey’s son, Sam. The rules still exist in the capital but apparently are applied far less rigorously. I admit to taking photos in several of Sam’s London pubs, even though I did so discretely, just in case! As others have pointed out, using mobiles for finding out bus and train times, will probably get the OK, but I am in complete agreement that noisy phone conversations, or sharing You Tube videos should remain on the “naughty list” and rightly so.

Commentators, such as Tandleman, whose own excellent review you can read here, have suggested that ad hoc sackings and closures will become a thing of the past, and pubs will be able to attract managers more easily. Furthermore, many of the closed pubs will re-open, and as TM suggests, young Sam will not throw out what makes the company’s pubs different and will definitely be keeping the best bits.

A final, précised piece from York CAMRA,  Humphrey was a man  with many quirks - but we'd do well not to forget that he presided over a family brewery that produces exceptional real ale and craft keg beers at very affordable prices and an estate of pubs that provide a huge social impact within their communities”.

"He leaves his son Samuel both a legacy on which to build but also a huge challenge in reopening many of their pubs that are currently closed and bringing some of their more arcane operational rules back into the 21st Century!"

For my part, I shall continue visiting the company’s London pubs, whenever I am in the capital, and the same applies to other towns and cities where Sam’s have a pub or two. In the meantime, it’s a question of “watch this space.”

Footnote: If I can stretch my memory back far enough, I might include a short piece about how, I lived just five minutes’ walk away from a long vanished, Sam Smith’s pub in the Lower Kersal area of Salford. This was back in my student days, and I’m pretty certain that the Old Brewery Bitter, dispensed from metered, electric pumps, was brewery-conditioned, “bright beer” rather than cask. I shall need to do some backtracking on this, but I believe the pub was called, the Prince of Wales.  

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks Paul.

I think I was sitting at the same table as you when you took a couple of those photos in a (currently closed) Stockport pub in 2021. Safe to publish them now, of course!

I thought the metered pumps used by Sam Smiths in the 1970s were dispensing beer from the cask, rather than bright beer. But that's just my impression based on memories of drinking Sam's in Morecambe and Preston, and other beers from metered pumps from breweries such as Yates & Jackson in Lancaster. I could well be wrong.

Stafford Paul said...

Yes, my recollection Is of OBB as a cask beer, more often metered than handpumped, and Sovereign the keg Bitter.

Yorkshire Grit said...

Anyone who thinks the changes will be a few pubs reopening and digital devices tolerated will have a big shock coming. I suspect the family will want to move on and simplify their lives. After all they are just assets within an asset rich family. A brewery may sound an attractive proposition to a beer boff, but to normal people its just a factory with the smell of malt. Nah they won't be interested in it. Do they want the customers and the people of Tadcaster thinking that they are now the Lord of the Feudel manor. No Siree

As for the pubs. Many are gone and beyond saving. Old school asthetics do not a pub make. The people have gone and things have moved on. They have no goodwill anymore. The pubs that have a reputation for three miserable old codgers and a misearble licensee won't get it back. The bygone atmosphere Mr Humphrey was trying to create went went long ago when they ceased to sell the big volumes of ale. That aint gonna come back. It's a fire sale buddy

Paul Bailey said...

Hi, Paul. Yes, the photos were taken in the smaller of those Sam Smith's Stockport pubs, the name of which escapes me. A nice little boozer, and first pub of the day, after the train journey up from Euston.

Anonymous said...

They're rubbish pubs. Miserable and dire. Brown like an out of date turd. Full of losers. Never once seen a working person in them. Avoid at all costs.

retiredmartin said...

That Stockport pub was the Queen's Head,. Paul, the one with (apparently) the smallest Gents !

https://retiredmartin.com/2021/10/26/stockport-old-codgers-reunion-21-it-begins/

Paul Bailey said...

There's far too much cynicism in the comments from Yorkshire Grit and, yet another "anonymous". Reminds me of Cooking Lager on steroids!

Why not look on the plus side, that with young Sam at the helm, and given a free hand to drop many (but not all), of his father’s restrictive policies, there's every chance that many of the pubs closed, by Humphrey, can reopen and be successful.

Yorkshire Grit said...

Why should I look on plus side. They are a company and if they sell what I like I will buy. I won't be one of these wallies that boycotts pub chains for whatever reasons thinking it will change the world. All you commentators are talking on it all as individual pubs. This is a large company that will be in turmoil. You have a very naive view. Anyway it's Monday and I will go and put my positive pants on.

Red Rose said...

I suspect somebody like Admiral will buy some of them. Brighten them up a bit and made a few quid, if and only if they are cute about it. They need to be run as leases / tenancies not managed houses. Nobody under 60 goes in those places.

Anonymous said...

Have you not heard how they managed that 5%

West Riding said...

People buy brands. SS don't do brands

Paul Bailey said...

Samuel Smiths surely is a "brand", and a highly respected one at that. The fact they have a pedigree as Yorkshire's oldest brewery, ought to speak volumes for the company.

West Riding said...

It's not a brand in a way anyone under 70 would recognize it. Brands are international / global. No brand of any substance is represented by a horse and cart. If you are talking about a nostalgia rush maybe. If you are talking about survival of a modern business then there has to be big change.