Tuesday, 25 June 2024

Car parking charges spark anger in quiet West Kent town

The Sunday before our cruise, the lad and I treated ourselves to a cooked breakfast, at the Ivy House pub in Tonbridge, before attending a protest meeting in the town centre. No before going any further I'd like to add that whilst I've been on a number of marches and demonstrations, back in my student days and, more recently against the madness and  futility of Brexit, these events have always been peaceful and good natured. The same applied to the other Sunday's protest, which took the form of a gathering at the entrance to River Walk, just below the outer walls of Tonbridge's imposing 13th century castle.
The purpose of the meeting was to draw attention to the local authority's plans to scrap free parking on Sundays and Bank Holidays.  The charging period will also be extended from 18:00 BST to 20:00. Parking on Christmas Day, Boxing Day, New Year's Day and overnight will remain free. Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council claim the changes are needed to help meet the rising costs of running its car parks,
with Conservative Councillor Martin Coffin claiming it could cost the council  £107,000 in lost income, if they do not introduce Sunday and late evening parking. So, despite strong opposition, cabinet members voted earlier earlier in June to implement the changes, which will come into force this summer.

Graham Simmonds, who organised Sunday's public meeting, said he thought Tonbridge would "without a doubt" suffer financially due to people not visiting the town as frequently, and claimed there was "huge anger" in the town over the proposed changes. He said that in two weeks a petition gained more than 3,000 signatures. "People come into Tonbridge to enjoy the park, to enjoy the castle, to do a bit of shopping, and bring money into our local economy," he added.

Teresa Seamer, who runs the Gorgeous George gift shop on the High Street, said that business was already harder than ever, with footfall dropping off significantly. Sunday however, is different, and is the best day of the week. "The whole town changes, it's just such a wonderful place to be. People can relax, they've got no time restraints, but if the charges come in that's all going to stop. It would be devastating to small businesses, and is utter madness. Retail outlets will question the viability of having a business in the town, and as evidence of this, 27 outlets hosted the petition against the extended hours."

Echoing the sentiments expressed above, Tonbridge resident Kay Sinclair, who has lived in the town for 40 years, said the new parking charges will decimate the high street. She said: “There is a real unique community vibe in Tonbridge on a Sunday. Unlimited time enjoying the eateries and shops, spending any disposable income in our town." She claimed that if these proposals go ahead, councilors would be guilty of going against the wishes of those members of the public who voted them into office in the belief they would serve the best interests of local residents. Expressing the views of other speakers, she added: “Sunday is a pivotal day for many Tonbridge businesses and the parking charges would decimate the high street, and be the death of Tonbridge as a community.”
Realistically the protest meeting, the various petitions and letters to councilors are unlikely to have much impact on a council that has already made up its mind, even though to many residents the move seems like just another move in TMBC's war on the private motorist. The sentiments and concerns, expressed above, are genuine, and despite the council's attempts to brush them off, they are likely to impact heavily on local businesses. It should be noted that none of the members of this inner cabinet - Star Chamber, would be a more appropriate  name, actually live in Tonbridge, and this too is cause for concern.

The district was created on 1 April 1974 under the Local Government Act 1972. It covered the whole area of two former districts and part of a third, all of which were abolished at the same time:

  • Malling Rural District
  • Tonbridge Rural District (parishes of Hadlow and Hildenborough only, the other parishes went to Tunbridge Wells)
  • Tonbridge Urban District
The new district was named Tonbridge & Malling, combining the names of the former districts. Borough status was attained in December 1983, with the authority changing its name to Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council, and allowing the chair of the council to take the title of mayor. The area controlled by the council is rather a hot-potch, particularly it extends as far north as Cuxton, whilst including villages such as Ditton and Larkfield that were historically part of Maidstone. 

The biggest anomaly concerns the area to the immediate south of Tonbridge, where despite our address having a central Tonbridge postcode, and us living just 20 minutes walk away from the town centre, 10 minutes on foot, in the other direction, brings us to the area controlled by Tunbridge Wells Borough Council. With boundaries drawn up by politicians and civil servants, with no knowledge or appreciation of local history, or traditions, it's little wonder that we can be screwed over by issues such as car parking charges.

 

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Even with the best will in the world last night's match was more interesting than this snore-fest.

The Village Greeners said...

Blimey. So 'Middle England' all this.

So glad I am Scottish

Paul Bailey said...

Presumably local authorities in Scotland fleece local motorists too?

retiredmartin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
retiredmartin said...

Good points, said similar;

https://retiredmartin.com/2019/11/07/barmy-in-brechin/

Whatever said...

Faggot

Stafford Paul said...

I suppose it's a bit like a pub saying it can no longer afford to have free bowls of nuts on the bar counter during Sundays and Bank Holidays.
Interesting times. Maybe everything will get better a week today !

Paul Bailey said...

Fingers crossed 🤞, but elections for the local council aren't due for a couple of years.

Interestingly, Tom Tugendhat - our local MP, who is seeking to be re-elected in a week's time, came out against these proposals, partly because of the negative effect they will have on local businesses, but probably also because of the Tories current poor showing in the national polls.

A's you point out, we shall discover the result in a week's time, although it would need a seismic shift for the man tipped to be the next Tory leader, to lose his seat.

Paul Bailey said...

In some respects, I agree that this issue sounds very Middle England, but when you have a local authority pleading poverty, whilst at the same time showing a healthy balance sheet, on their accounts.

Something is wrong, somewhere!

Paul Bailey said...

Strange remark, from someone who seems desperate to provoke a reaction.

The Village Greeners said...

What's a few quid for parking?

A pint costs £6 and maybe £17 for a meal out. Local authority has no duty to provide parking. They historically own the land and are just maximising the income from it to support other services. They are presumably proving nice clean parking and CCTV for ye. Stop moaning man there are bigger issues in the world.

If you don't like it park up the road, I would.

Professor Pie-Tin said...

Tugendhat the man tipped to be the next Tory leader ?
By who ?
Some bookies will give you shorter odds on Lord Nigel of Farage as next leader.
I got my bet in early for Reform to pick up 10+ seats on the day Farage announced he was running.
Should we be successful my oldest pal and I intend to celebrate with a piss-up at Boisdale in that there London as we have celebrating winning bets on the Brexit referendum and last three elections.
Tugendhat could maybe chair an enquiry about what went wrong among the re-lected Tories - I know of a good telephone kiosk where he could hold it.
But I'll save them the bother. If you spend your time trying to overturn the Brexit vote and then when presented with an 80 seat majority to carry it out you simply ignore it and deliver record levels of immigration both legal and illegal don't be surprised if your voters respond with a hobnailed boot to the nuts.
They're finished.

Paul Bailey said...

I checked back on your post Martin, and saw that I made a couple of comments.

It seems that the worthy residents of Brechin mounted a far more aggressive response to their local authority's proposal than that adopted by sleepy old Tonbridge.

When I am a little less busy, I shall carry out a Google search to see how they got on.

ps. I remember that excellent free carpark in the centre of Ely. There were similar arrangements in both Dereham and Swaffham.