The pub was probably the long-demolished Park Hotel, a traditional,
multi bar establishment, that had seen better days. The pub was under threat of
closure and demolition, to make way for Ashford’s new shopping centre, which
explains the lack of investment. Shortly
afterwards my friends and I gravitated to the Invicta, a three-storey, corner
pub in the Godington Road area of the town.
Boston describes this effect as a “Symphony in Brown” but, as others pointed out, these are the colours of beer ranging from pale ales, through to bitters and stouts. The darker colours were often reserved for the matchboard section of the lower half. Public bars tended to be male dominated or had a preponderance of men - the classic, “lads of the village” type of thing, and were also home to traditional pub games, such as darts, bar-billiards, dominoes, or cards - the latter being strictly non-gambling games, of course. Perversely, despite their male dominance, public bars were often looked after by a female member of staff, most of whom suffered no nonsense from any of the customers, regardless of their sex. One example I recall well, was the Dog & Bear at Lenham, a large village between Ashford and Maidstone. The Dog & Bear was formerly a coaching inn, and like most pubs at the time, had two bars. The Public bar was called "Joyce's Bar", whilst the Saloon was called "Squirrel’s Bar" after the nickname of the characterful landlord, with his trademark handlebar moustache and mutton-chop whiskers. So Squirrel looked after Saloon, with its preponderance of female drinkers, whilst his wife Joyce kept stock of the male dominated Public Bar.
Saloon bars were nearly always carpeted and were decorated with much more ornate wall-coverings, including that ghastly gold and burgundy, "flock wallpaper" that became all the rage as the 1970’s drew on. The seating too was more comfortable, compared to the rather basic wooden bench seating and chairs, traditionally found in the public bar. In the saloon the chairs and benches would be covered and padded, providing seating that was far more comfortable, and also appealing to women. If you wanted a lunchtime or evening meal, this would normally be served in the saloon bar, unless of course the pub had its own separate restaurant.
When I went up to Manchester to study at Salford University, I had to get used to a whole new vocabulary when it came to pubs. Public bars were invariably known as the Vault, whereas saloon bars were more likely described as the Lounge Bar. Some northern pubs had a Smoking Room, and I recall one establishment that even had a Reading Room. If anything, the Vaults in some of these straight-talking northern towns, were even more male dominated then their southern counterparts. The same situation applied in the small number of pubs the operated an exclusively male vault. Women were barred from the vault, in these places, and I remember as a student, taking part in a demonstration against such obvious examples of sexual discrimination. Several months later legislation was brought in outlawing, such practises. This, of course, was a result of pressure being applied in parliament, rather than a scruffy bunch of students conducting an impromptu protest! Despite the claims of some historians, separate bars for different sectors of society was not an anachronistic survivor from a class-ridden age. Instead, there were sound practical reasons behind the styling of the different bars. Public bars, for example, were often frequented by men in overalls, covered in dust or plaster from nearby building sites. These were working people who would drop in for a quick pint, either at lunchtime, or on their way home. It wouldn’t have been practical for them to go home and get changed first. Conversely, city business men, dressed in expensive suits, want to be rubbing shoulders with other men, or women, wearing the same attire, rather than with tradesmen straight off the construction site. This is just one example of the benefits of a multi-bar pub, and another one that Richard Boston was keen to remind us of was, prices were usually lower in the public bar. As stated earlier, the public bar was traditionally the place where games were played. In addition, if a pub has two bars regardless of what they might be called, it is relatively easy to avoid a group of people or an individual you don't particularly like, but the most important factor for a traditional pub is it’s a place where people can feel at home. Despite these sound reasons for retaining multi-bar pubs, their numbers have continue to dwindle. Back in the mid 1970’s, when Boston was writing his book, the trend towards the abolition of the public bar and it's replacement by a barn-like interior was on the up. Unfortunately, that trend continued to gather pace, steadily but also stealthily, so much so that many of us didn't even notice it happening. Eventually a tipping point was reached, and now multi bar pubs are very much the exception rather than the rule, certainly in this part of the country. I have however felt heartened after recent visits to towns and cities such as Bath, Burton-on-Trent, Sheffield, Henley on Thames, Norwich and of course Manchester. If you know where to look, and you're a connoisseur of good pubs you can still find pubs offering a variety of different rooms to drink in, including some with traditional public bars, so good hunting!
16 comments:
Really an interesting post Paul. I knew the general history here, but the personal angle really made it shine.
Thank-you, Dave. I'm glad you found the post interesting, along with my personal take on the subject.
Things obviously change over time, and pubs are no exception. The same can probably said about pub goers as well, but when changes, such as removing partitions between different bars, are made by those who don't really understand, or indeed appreciate, the purpose and the history behind what they are doing, it does make me rather cross.
Sad as well, but that's life, as they say!
Paul,
Your mention of a “Shirts will be worn!” sign at a pub kept by “a former military man” in the 1970s reminds me of my nearest pub from 1974 to 1976 which was kept by a Frank “the Major” Carey who insisted on not just shirts but also ties being worn by men in the Lounge. A couple snogging was such a heinous act that it was big news in the local newspaper. Former military men can comfortably live on their military pensions and, though some properly adapt to civilian life, pompous gits like that Frank should have left the running of pubs to those with a knowledge of the real world and those who knew that keg Ansells wasn’t a perfectly good beer. I think I could count on one hand the times over those two years that I had a bottle of Guinness in the Crossbow.
Wonderful photos, Paul. I agree there are still many pubs with plenty of character about.
Though it may be a sweeping generalisation, it seems to me that multi-roomed pubs are much more likely to attract a more diverse clientele and large single rooms more likely to be frequented by a much more homogenised group of customers.
Like me Paul, you obviously remember the relatively large numbers of ex-military men who ran pubs back in the 1970’s. Not your average corporals or sergeants either, but middle ranking officers such as majors or colonels. Sometimes it was a good thing, because they brought a touch of order and decorum to the establishments they ran, but more often than not they acted in the pompous, Captain Mainwaring like manner that you and I have both commented on.
Glad you liked the photos, Martin. I don’t have any dating back to the time when I began my pub going career, so the ones I included are all fairly examples, taken over the past couple of years. If you look closely, you will probably recognise pub interiors in Bath, Burton, London, Norwich, Stockport and Sheffield, as well as a couple of shots taken closer to home.
Hi Andy, I tend to agree with your generalisation about multi-roomed pubs, and another point in their favour, which was listed by Richard Boston, was the ability to escape from an individual, or even a crowd of people, that you might not particularly like, or want to share space with.
Can we put away that picture of the Chafford now.That's three times you've used it already this month including twice in one post.
I also get the impression you're going on a cruise soon.Can't think why ...
Two different shots of the same side view of the Chafford, taken at different times of the year. The bicycle, leaning up against the air-con unit, is the clue, here, anonymous, as it is only present in one picture. The pub is rather photogenic, and the words Public Bar, illustrate nicely the main point of this post.
Yes, we do have a cruise coming up, at the beginning of next month, just in case you hadn't noticed!
Paul,
Yes, "sometimes it was a good thing" but it was rather scary to realise that the Crossbow's licensee previously had some responsibility for our country's defence.
Tbh your bizarre and apparently indiscriminate bolding of words in your copy is a little off-putting too.
Used occasionally for dramatic effect it's a useful literary tool.
But when you just sling one in on any old word or festoon the post with them like an outbreak of a particularly virulent strain of acne they just look amateurish.
Anything else wrong, anonymous??
I get the impression that people don't know just how good it is nowadays. You don't want the Seventies.
Anonymous, I have removed your last four comments for their bizarre nature, and increasingly off-topic irrelevance.
If you haven't got anything sensible to say, then please don't say it, otherwise I shall have no option, but to block you, from this site.
Comments on this post are now closed!
I find the use of bold relevant and helpful, Paul.
Thank-you Martin.
Post a Comment