Back to the narrative. After arising shortly before 9am yesterday, I made my way downstairs, as usual, to make us both a cup of tea. Returning back to the bedroom, with said refreshing and stimulating liquid, I glanced at my watch and was mildly surprised to notice that my step count was precisely zero. Perhaps, like me, my Garmin Forerunner 45 was taking time to get going, so I thought little of it, apart from placing the timepiece on charge, because the battery indicator was advising a recharge was necessary.
After a fairly hectic schedule the day before, I didn’t have a lot planned, apart from catching up with this blog, and sorting things out for our forthcoming cruise. The weather was dull and overcast, but I was still looking forward to a walk, after breakfast. When I fastened the watch back around my wrist, the step count was still showing zero, even though the power indicator was showing the unit was fully charged. That was when the “fun” started.
I’ll be the first to admit that I’m not the most tech-savvy of people, and I will also say that smartwatches aren’t the easiest of devices to programme or adjust. There are five buttons, located around the periphery of the watch casing, and whilst one is just a light, the others allow access to a number of other functions that allow the user to scroll up and down. They have to be pressed in the correct order, sometimes holding one down whilst pressing another. This isn’t exactly intuitive, and there have been past occasions where I have ended up accessing the completely wrong part of the built-in programme, and I think this is what happened when I attempted to re-engage the step-counter. Unfortunately, rather than re-connecting the step counter, I ended up by disengaging the heart-rate monitor, so I now have a smartwatch where two of the most important functions don’t work. Not smart at all, and despite various online guides and You Tube videos, I have not been able to rectify the matter. Mrs PBT’s had already told me to stop obsessing about the issue, saying that it’s just a watch, and to a certain extent it is. However, both functions, although more so the step counter, form part of my daily routine, giving me something to aim at each day, as I head off on a walk, or make a decision to leave the car at home and go on foot instead.The ultimate solution, of course, would be a factory re-set, but as I don't know how to do that, I shall leave things until Monday, and consult one of my work colleagues. The person in question, is not only very tech savvy, he’s also a smartwatch user as well – a Garmin model too, albeit a higher spec model than my own. He’s a keen cyclist too, and uses his watch to record his various cycle rides, so if he can’t help me, then I don’t know who can.First world problems, of course, but still a very real one, and for someone determined to remain fit well into the next decade, a rather important one as well.
4 comments:
Paul,
"the recent failure of my Smart Watch" reminds me that I tend to avoid like the plague anything prefixed "smart". So not only no so called smart watch but also I have no so called smart phone, no so called smart gas or electricity meter and avoid as much as possible so called smart motorways including the M6 near me.
i know what you mean, Paul. We have persistently refused so-called smart meters, for both gas and electricity, and after breaking down on a "smart" section of the M25, the same applies to motorways. Thankfully, in the latter case, I was able to "limp" my vehicle along to a relatively nearby service station, and the car was recovered from there.
The Smart Watch, is just a gadget, admittedly a useful one, and fortunately, my work colleague was able to reset it for me, as I knew he probably would.
Paul,
I wasn't meaning to suggest that there was necessarily anything wrong with a gadget or two and realise that my Railcard and my bus pass are each "a small device with a particular purpose".
I've only broken down on a motorway once, nearly twenty years ago and not surprisingly driving for work which has accounted for about nine-tenths of the miles driven since passing my test aged thirty. The advice is to get behind the barrier by I was on the elevated section of the M6 near Great Barr and the thirty foot drop could have been fatal.
When motorways were being designed during our infancy it was blatantly obvious that motor vehicles at high speed ( unlimited until the end of 1965 ) needed a proper continuous refuge.
Those designing so called "smart motorways" must have guessed that their danger would result in the project being discontinued within twenty years but they were cheap and that's all that mattered. They would surely have removed the central crash barriers too if that could increase capacity by one third.
Paul, it seems incredible now, that when motorways first appeared in the UK, there were no crash barriers on the central reservation to prevent cross-over collisions. After checking, I discovered they began to be fitted in 1970, with a "lightening" project, to install them on all UK motorways, carried out in 1972-3.
They've been around for much longer than I thought, and I suppose one could argue, traffic was much lighter 50+ years ago.
Post a Comment